What is the difference between a hydraulic chuck and a collet?

Milling is a core operation in all kinds of manufacturing environments. There are five different kinds of milling holders, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. We&#;re here to help you choose with the breakdown and top recommendation for using each.
 

DRAKE are exported all over the world and different industries with quality first. Our belief is to provide our customers with more and better high value-added products. Let's create a better future together.

Milling chucks
Let&#;s start with the jack of all trades in the world of milling holders. Milling chucks&#; high retention force combined with a simple twist-to-lock operation makes them ideal for general purpose operations. These chucks grip a tool shank by means of mechanical deformation of rows of needle bearings. These holders provide substantially more gripping force than a collet. Runout, however, is reduced compared to collet chucks, but is still better than double the performance of side lock systems. Their large bodies help dampen vibration and chatter. The option for high-pressure coolant delivery through the tool is also useful.

Top tip
The bigger the milling chuck, the more the clamping force. Larger size chucks have a higher starting potential clamping force. When paired with a reduction collet the final gripping force is higher than a direct clamping size chuck.

Hydraulic chuck
Hydraulic chucks are often more specialized because of their slim body shape, higher cost and moderate gripping strength&#;about half that of a milling chuck and about double that of collet chucks. The main differences between the holders, in terms of performance, are the superior vibration damping and simpler handling of hydraulic chucks. They are most often used for finish milling, reaming and drilling. They are extremely easy to handle. A simple clamping screw activates hydraulic chambers that allow the holder to clamp down on the tool.

Top tip
Never exceed a hydraulic chuck&#;s rated rpm; fluid is pulled away from the holder&#;s internal gripping gland, causing loss of clamping force.

Shrink-fit holders
Often compared to hydraulic chucks because they can also have very slim bodies, shrink-fit holders share similar gripping force as well. Handling is much more involved, but from an engineering perspective, shrink-fit holders are, fundamentally, the perfect tool holder. There are no moving parts, they are naturally symmetrically round and they use the properties of the holder itself&#;with the help of heat&#;to grip the tool. But as we know, a manufacturing floor is not a perfect environment. Variables must be considered when choosing equipment.

Best for moderate to heavy milling, shrink-fit holders are excellent at high speeds and are especially useful in low clearance, tight work envelopes because of their relatively slim design. Gripping power varies based on the tolerance of the cutting tool shank and outside body diameter: the heavier the wall, the higher the gripping force.

Top tip
Shrink-fit holders have very tight-tolerance bores. They should be cleaned and dried between each tool change. If you&#;re considering shrink-fit holders or already own them, check out these tooling and spindle cleaners.

Side-lock end mill holders
These may be a bit simpler in terms of how they clamp than hydraulic and shrink fit, but these rugged holders definitely have their place. A flat in the tool engages with a Weldon screw on the holder that locks the assembly in place, all but eliminating the risk of pullout, even in the toughest metals. They are most effective when heavy roughing at low speeds. What side-lock end mill holders achieve in security, they often lack in precision. Avoid high speeds and cuts with higher risks of vibration unless you&#;re using high-performance tooling like the MEGA Perfect Grip.

Top tip
Never use tools with homemade, hand-ground flats in a side lock end mill holder.

Collet chucks
From a low-speed specialist to high, collet chucks work best at elevated rpm. This makes them excellent for delicate and precise work like drilling, reaming and finish milling. The collar-like gripping is tightened by way of wrenching a collet nut. This allows for more points of contact for the tool when compared to other chucks. Collets are most useful in repetitive work where the clamping requirement does not vary significantly.

They also are versatile because the number of segmentations on a collet can vary. More segments mean greater flexibility and a larger gripping range at the cost of some of the concentricity and stability of more rigid collets.

Top tip
High-performance bearing race nuts offer the highest gripping strength combined with stable runout accuracy. The bearing keeps the race from sliding against the surface of the collet. The friction of a solid nut sliding across the collet face twists the collet and increases runout as well as increases the clamping torque required.    

Ready to dig a little deeper into holders for straight-shank milling tools? Explore all our high-performance tool holders right now.

Everybody being it an owner, manager, programmer, or setter who is in-depth into CNC machining is familiar with the fact that the investment, the accuracy, reliability, and precision for a milling or mill turning machine operations is not complete with the sole purchase of the machine itself. Besides the fixtures and work holding devices and the tooling, a great investment and a major factor for the accuracy, ease of use, and reliability of the machining process is the tool holding choice. Today there are many special types of Milling Machines Tool-Holding and tooling solutions to suit best to the intended application. However, the scope of this comparison will be between a few general types which are most commonly used - the collet type, hydraulic, and shrink fit.

Being useful for separate qualities of their own and having their pros and cons, it is very often subject to making a Milling Machines Tool-Holding solution between one of them. However, when deciding which one to use it is their differences that will guide your choice. In order to make a liable comparison, we will try to look at the most important aspects of this decision-making by looking not only at the technical but the economical facts as well.

Precision & Security

We have to start with putting on the scale one of the most important factors. If you think a runout of 0.in could be acceptable you have to read this - studies show that run-outs of 0.in can triple the tool life, meaning that poor precision could be absolutely detrimental and lead to increased tooling costs.

Actually, the three types of tools can show very similar results as far as it concerns accuracy. With radial runouts less than 0.003mm or 0.in achievable with all types, it is out of the question that we can get the desired results. Even some ER types of collets which suffer from pullout stability and torque transmission, are able to deliver 0.002-0.005mm or 0.-0.in. However, there are other collet type holders like the so-called power chucks being far more superior in terms of power. They have features like axial slits to prevent tool rotation and radial ones preventing the tool pull out. The gripping force of these chucks is powerful enough to actually compress the tool shank slightly and expand into the slits. Tests show that the chucking torque force can deliver up to Nm or lbf and this combined with an acceptable radial runout of less than 0.in.

Shrink fit and hydraulic tool holders are offering unsurpassed gripping and high clamping torque and no centrifugal forces due to clamping segments. Depending on the clamping diameter the hydraulic ones can deliver over nm (lbf).

The hydraulic tool holders offer higher holding forces of shrinking, high torque transmission, and bending distance 1.4 times greater than shrink chuck. A big plus is the dampening effect due to the cushioning of the hydraulic membrane. The shrink system on the other side is a bit less reliant in terms of vibration because of its dependence on the heating and cooling processes.

Want more information on hydraulic chuck working? Feel free to contact us.

Variativity & Flexibility

When talking about making choices it is of great importance to know the limits and restrictions of the different tool holder types. Generally speaking, the collet chucks are the most versatile ones as they can come in different standards and sizes, different sized collets, and even size ranges for them. They can conduct coolant in a different way just by switching to a different type of collet. As well as with the hydraulic ones that have sleeves they can both use a through coolant channel system for tools without coolant holes to deliver it directly to the cutting edge. On the other side the shrink fit can only use flush or through coolant which makes it a bit more demanding for delivering it well for milling operations.

While considering the accessibility, the collet type chucks cannot offer as good as the shrink fit and the hydraulic solution. The collet chuck is comprised of a collet, holder body, and a cap which is comparatively much bigger than the maximum size of the tool to be clamped. Although an extension can be employed it will compromise both the gripping force and the accuracy.

Actually, the shrink fit tool holders were unsurpassed in terms of accessibility because of their elongated design, a fact which with the advance of 3D metal printing technology changed to a great extent. Now on the market, you have hydraulic systems allowing for deep reach and side clearance comparable to the shrink fit systems.

It must be noted that an important feature to look at while choosing the hydraulic is the position of the membrane as not all tool manufacturers would offer to have it from the front of the holder meaning that for smaller applications the tool will be supported further from the cutting zone. Also, the clamping depth has a minimum before which it is not recommended to use.

Setup & Maintenance

Probably you can guess that the shrink fit is most uncomfortable because of the heating and cooling processes involved. An inconvenience for an operator will not only be the risk of burning but the wait for the cooling before the tool can be used. Hydraulic systems can lock the tool simply by tightening with a hex wrench or a sector key which is the most common case with the collet types too.

Initial Investment

As we already discussed some of the pros and cons technically we should now look at the numbers behind the investment. Being the newest and more advanced technology the hydraulic tool holders have relatively highest prices among all. This is because of the delicate clamping membrane built into the holders which adds cost.

Besides the smaller sized ones that can only clamp a single diameter the reduction sleeves available are about $150 at least. The same is the situation with the power chucks from the collet type holders and only the ER type collets and the ER holder itself or similar could be of low price

Shrink fit holders are of a slightly lower price than the hydraulic chucks. However, the major difference for this type of solution will be the induction heater shrink fit machine which starts at prices around $.

Conclusion

Having exposed all the above it is clear that each and every solution has its advantages over the other two. Being based on the accuracy, price, accessibility, or whatever factor it will be difficult to stick to only one of the tool holder types. Therefore order to get the advantage of the features of the three tool types to offer most. Shops wouldn't use only a single type, but a combination, if not all of them. Which ones you will choose is up to you!

For more CNC 3 Jaw Power Chuckinformation, please contact us. We will provide professional answers.